September 5, 2010
9/11 – Revisited
There were no hijackers. Wail and Waleed al-Shehri
Are still living, in Morocco. Waleed could not have
Stabbed one of the flight attendants on American 11.
The passenger manifests released to the public did
Not include the name of any of the hijackers. It did
Not even include any name of Middle Eastern origin.
Not one of the eight pilots on the four flights alerted
Ground control that a hijacking was taking place. None
Punched the standard code (7500) on his transponder.
The passport of Satam al-Suqami was not found in
The rubble of the Twin Towers, and neither was that
Of Ziad Jarrah found at the crash site of United 93.
Mohamed Atta and Abdul al-Omari did not drive to
Portland, Maine, on September 10th. Atta’s will was
Not found in any luggage at Boston’s Logan Airport.
There was no telephone call initiated by anyone,
Either passenger or attendant, on any of the flights.
No call was made, either from cell or onboard phones.
The United States Department of Justice has not
Indicted Osama bin Laden for the 9/11 crime. No
“Confession video” was found in Jalalabad, Afghanistan.
On December 1st, 2001, at Tora Bora, Afghanistan, the U.S.
Army, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the Pakistan
Intelligence Agency (ISI), made possible bin Laden’s escape.
The Pentagon, probably the best-defended building
In the world, was indeed protected on 9/11 by anti-
Aircraft batteries. Whatever hit it, was not an airplane.
Told that an aircraft was approaching the capital, Vice-
President Cheney gave the order for the North American
Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) to stand down.
The Pentagon was not evacuated, and neither was
President Bush evacuated from the Sarasota School.
He remained there for a full half hour after the attacks.
The 9/11 Commission Report, published in 2004, made
No mention of the fact that Building 7 of the World Trade
Center, though not hit by an airplane, also collapsed.
The Final Report of the National Institute of Standards
And Technology (NIST), published in 2005, does not
Include an explanation for the collapse of Building 7.
Most of the hijackers were said to be of Saudi origin
Because President Bush was planning invasions, not
Only of Afghanistan and Iraq, but also of Saudi Arabia.
New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani knew in advance that
The Twin Towers would collapse. So did those who, in the
Days prior to the attack, took out selected put options.
President Bush, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld,
And National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, all
Marveled at the “opportunities” provided by 9/11.
This sentiment was even expressed
officially, in The
National
Security Strategy of the United States of America,
Issued by the Bush Administration, in September 2002.
On the evening of 9/11, far from contrite for having
Failed to protect even the Pentagon itself, Rumsfeld
Challenged the Nation to spend more on defense.
. . .
All courtesy
of
A
compliant media, national security secrecy,
The remote control of airplanes,
controlled building
Demolition, voice morphing
technology and more . . .
References
Principal Reference:
Griffin, David. 2008. The new Pearl Harbor, revisited – 9/11, the cover-up, and the expose. Northampton, MA: Interlink/Olive Branch.
Pp. x, 10-11, 41, 267, 232 and 336 (Building 7, the Commission Final Report; NIST delay); Pp. xii and xvii-xviii (The mainstream press); Pp. 59-62, 109, 164-170, 173-174, 227 and 233-234 [Telephone calls: American Flight 11 (North Tower); United Flight 175 (South Tower); American Flight 77 (Pentagon)]; Pp. 63-65, 67-75, 101-103, 109 and 233 (The Pentagon hit);
Pp. 91 and 109 (The Pentagon, lack of evacuation); Pp. 95-96, 203 and 234 (Stand-down Order); Pp. 106-107 (The Pentagon protection); P. 109 (Summary of Flight 77 and the Pentagon); Pp. 111-112, 118-120, 164, 227 and 234 [Telephone calls: United Flight 93 (Pennsylvania)]; Pp. 114-115 (Voice morphing Technology);
Pp. 129-131 and 336-337 (Bush, lack of evacuation); Pp. 136 and 257 (Put options); Pp. 151-153, 162-163, 234 and 309 (Identity of the hijackers); P. 152 (Waleed al-Shehri responsible for stabbing a flight attendant on American 11); Pp. 155-156, 159-161, 172 and 235 (Atta’s luggage); Pp. 170-171 and 235 (Passport of Satam al-Suqami); Pp. 171 and 235 (Passport of Ziad Jarrah); Pp. 174-175 (Flight Manifests); Pp. 176-179 and 235 (Lack of response by pilots);
Pp. 202-203 and 230 (Planned invasion of Saudi Arabia); Pp. 195, 205-206 and 222-223 (Escape of Osama bin Laden); Pp. 206-207, 211 and 235 (Lack of indictment of Osama bin Laden); Pp. 208-210 (“Confession video” by Osama bin Laden); Pp. 52, 232 and 336 (Advance knowledge by Giuliani about the Twin Towers); Pp. 241-244 (The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, 2002); Pp. 202 and 322 (The attacks as presenting an opportunity).
Other References:
Griffin, David.
2004, The new Pearl Harbor – disturbing questions about
the Bush administration and 9/11. Northampton, MA: Interlink/Olive Branch.
Summarized in Francoise Hall, 2004. “9/11 – Outsourced by the CIA.” June 11 (22 pages, unpublished).
2005a. The 9/11 Commission Report – omissions and distortions. Northampton, MA: Interlink/Olive Branch.
Summarized in Francoise Hall, 2005. “The 9/11 Report – An Analysis.” June 18 (19 pages, unpublished).
2005b. “9/11 – Possible Motives of the Bush Administration.” Global Research.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=1391. Accessed September 4, 2010.
2006. Christian Faith and the Truth behind 9/11. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.
Summarized in Francoise Hall, 2006. “Wanted: A new Pearl Harbor – The U.S. Government’s Incentives for organizing the 9/11 Attacks.” August 12 (59 pages, unpublished).
[See pages 21 and 22 for quotes from President Bush (on September 13, 2001), Donald Rumsfeld (on October 12, 2001), and Condoleezza Rice (in March 2002), expressing that the 9/11 attacks presented opportunities].
Hall, Francoise,
2004. “9/11 – Outsourced by the CIA.” June 11 (22 pages, unpublished). (See Griffin 2004).
2005. “The 9/11 Report – An Analysis.” June 18 (19 pages, unpublished). (See Griffin 2005a).
2006. “Wanted: A new Pearl Harbor – The U.S. Government’s Incentives for organizing the 9/11 Attacks.” August 12 (59 pages, unpublished). (See Griffin 2006).
Van Auken, Bill, 2004. “Why won’t Condoleezza Rice give open, sworn Testimony on 9/11?” World Socialist Web Site. March 30.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/mar2004/rice-m30.shtml. Accessed September 5, 2010.
***